Skip to content

Draft clarity and evidence

Free GEO content checker

Paste a draft to check definitions, attribution cues, section structure and long sentences. Review the wording before you publish.

Use the GEO content checker

Your input

GEO content checker inputs

0 / 16,000

No account required. Fair-use limits apply. This check analyses the input you provide.

Check the details. Then check the answers.

See when AI names your brand and which pages it cites in a free visibility report.

Get your free report

Your text at a glance

Example input

A sample setup. Add your input or load the example to try it.

Text excerpt

What is a balcony garden? A balcony garden is a collection of container plants grown on a balcony. How to get started 1. Measure sunlight. 2. Pick containers with drainage. 3. Choose plants for your climate. Check moisture daily. Container size and weather affect watering needs.

Target keyword

balcony garden

Characters
282
Paragraphs
4
In this example

How this tool worksEvaluates supplied text using structural and specificity heuristics. It does not test an AI engine or establish whether the content will be cited.

Make the answer easy to follow

Review the explanation before publishing the draft.

Paste a passage to inspect its direct explanations, source-like URLs, attribution wording, section syntax and sentence load. Add an optional topic phrase to count its exact wording.

Use the findings to locate an answer that arrives too late, a sequence that needs structure or a claim that needs a source. Read each observation against the passage’s purpose before choosing an edit.

A practical workflow

How to use the GEO content checker

  • Paste a coherent draft or section

    Use up to 16,000 input characters. Preserve headings, lists and paragraph breaks when they are part of the structure you want reviewed.

  • Add an optional topic phrase

    Use the exact wording you want counted. The tool matches normalized word tokens; it does not infer synonyms or semantic topic coverage.

  • Review and revise in context

    Keep necessary detail, split genuinely overloaded sentences and verify your important references. Recheck the edited passage without writing solely for the heuristics.

Example

Give a reader a definition, a path and something to verify

Build a container-gardening passage around a direct explanation, a useful sequence and references the reader can follow.

Container gardening is growing plants in pots or other containers.

Name the subject before expanding into practical detail. Keep the balcony setting and scope close to the definition.

How the check works

Use text patterns to choose what to review.

The checker applies defined text rules, including English explanation and attribution patterns. An evidence finding means URL and attribution cues appeared together; the tool does not open sources, verify claims or ask an AI model to judge the passage.

An absent cue can be reasonable. A short product instruction may not need a formal definition or an external citation. Decide what the reader needs before adding structure or references.

An editable passage

Build an answer that carries its context.

Keep the answer’s scope, structure and supporting context clear enough for a reader to follow.

Start with a direct, bounded definition.

A reader should understand what the subject means before encountering a long background section. The checker recognizes simple English explanation patterns, not the truth of the definition.

Example definitionExample
  1. TopicContainer gardening
  2. OpeningContainer gardening is growing plants in pots or other containers.
  3. ScopeThis passage focuses on outdoor balconies.

Keep the scope beside the answer so it survives being quoted.

Sentence load

Use the estimate as a prompt to read aloud.

Sentence load divides word tokens by punctuation-delimited sentences. Abbreviations, decimal punctuation and different language conventions can affect that estimate. The tool flags a high average for review, but does not perform a comprehensive readability assessment.

A technical sentence may need precision and qualifications. Split it when that improves comprehension while preserving its meaning. Removing a caveat to shorten the sentence can make the content less useful even if a heuristic appears cleaner.

Before and after publication

Text structure and page structure are different inputs.

This checker sees the characters you paste. It does not read a URL, detect browser layout or confirm that your CMS publishes semantic headings. After publication, use the GEO audit to inspect the actual HTML and the crawlability checker for a separate access-policy question.

GEO audit

Review answer structure, source cues and publisher context in a public page’s HTML.

Content outline generator

Turn a topic or public page into headings, reader questions and evidence to collect.

Semantic validator

Compare a draft or public page with its intended topic and find gaps or ambiguous passages.

Questions, answered

GEO content checker: your questions answered

A closer look at the inputs, method and next steps.

sourcesignal.ai● ONLINE
Pick a question and I’ll explain how this tool works.

Does the tool use an AI model?

No. It uses transparent text rules for explanation, attribution, sections, sentence load and topic matching. No generative engine is asked to judge the draft.

Can it predict whether the passage will be cited?

No. Content structure alone cannot establish retrieval or citation. Use a separate AI-answer sample to observe what an engine actually returns for a specific question.

Does it check whether my claims are true?

No. It detects source-like URLs and attribution language, but does not open those references or compare them with the claims. Verification remains a separate editorial task.

Why does a non-English definition receive a warning?

Definition and attribution cues are based on English patterns. Unicode counts and phrase tokens still work, but language-related findings need manual interpretation in other languages.

How are paragraphs and characters counted?

Characters use Unicode code points after the analysis trims the input. Paragraphs are separated by blank lines. These are descriptive counts, not measures of display width or content quality.

Does the topic check recognize synonyms?

No. It looks for whole-token matches after Unicode compatibility and case normalization. Related terms and inflections are not treated as the exact target phrase.

Should every passage contain a citation?

Only where evidence is useful and appropriate. Verify important claims and link relevant sources. Adding an unrelated URL merely to clear a warning does not improve the explanation.

Navigate the AI landscape. Place your brand on the map.

See when AI names your brand, which competitors appear, and the pages those answers cite. Turn what you find into a practical next step.

Five AI engines. No card required.